Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stage peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants chat gratis en espaГ±ol were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Dietary discipline is counted of the Dietary Level of Restaurants Perceptions Shot (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), made up of sixteen comments scored with the a beneficial six-section scale (never ever = 0/always = 5), having highest ratings indicating a higher level out-of controlled restaurants. Toward Consume psychometrical attributes find Garner ainsi que al. (1982). The fresh surface coefficient both for products, the newest Mexican and you will German of those, are of the identical well worth, an alpha from 0.76.
Weight-loss restraint
Ineffectiveness measure. New negative connect with foundation is actually projected from the Ineffectiveness Scale out of the fresh Dinner Conditions Collection (EDI) (Garner mais aussi al., 1983), which has illustrated an excellent convergent legitimacy (ineffectiveness/self-esteem ) off Roentgen = 0.70 (p
Medical professionals got the weight and level measures
Bmi (BMI). Body mass index is actually calculated due to the fact weight from inside the kilograms separated from the top within the square yards (Body mass index = kg/m2).
Prior to studies range, an effective pilot study of the fresh new Silhouettes Size (Figure step 1), placed on an example including 20 North american country college students, was applied to check the newest appropriateness of the rates so you’re able to represent body types, to validate an excellent acceptation away from an unfamiliar gang of silhouettes and you can a definite comprehension of the new advice (brand new German class currently counted which have analysis in this regard). The outcome displayed the Shape Level are an excellent otherwise an suitable software on North american country shot.
The latest investigators of the two nations, in the Mexico Urban area as well as Hae (standardized) process. This new forms had been applied to groups of medical and you may medical youngsters from the Mexican and Italian language universities. One of the reasons trailing the fresh ples regarding pupils regarding drug try just the notice you to definitely (one can assume) such teenagers need to your scientific occupation as well as health problems, making them alot more tuned in to troubles like ED. Told consent try taken from all data professionals. The contacted children accessible to participate. The fresh particular local integrity committees recognized the newest low-intrusive process. Top-notch translators undertook and you will controlled the new translation and you will retranslation of your own products.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for