Grams.) The wedding out-of Mark MEEKS and you will Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?)

Grams.) The wedding out-of Mark MEEKS and you will Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?)

The guy purchased and increased right here what turned his house with the next twenty two decades and on this one most of the children was indeed produced except the 2 eldest. Inside 1891 the guy sold it home and you will ordered section 32 into the cut-off ten regarding four miles northeast off Chillicothe, that he enhanced and you will leftover since property-stead.

Sworn so you can and you will subscribed ahead of me, that it 21st day of Oct

His Christian lifetime lengthened as a consequence of a period of more than 40 years. He stored firmly for the Primitive Baptist trust, and therefore turned into his whole comfort in his history months and by one another precepts and you will analogy he represented the greatest form of a keen American resident.

Mark MEEKS’ second matrimony, in order to Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?),[COMMENT] is September 21, 1858 into the Claiborne Parish, Louisiana. There is nothing recognized in the a wedding so you’re able to a beneficial COHEN except that the wedding licenses, recorded within Relationships Guide 1, webpage 914, suggestions the marriage just like the ranging from elizabeth, and you will Sarah generated their own draw. The wedding is actually did by the J. W. McKINZIE, J. P.

T. KERLEY

I, T. T. KERLEY, create solemnly swear which i in the morning 21 yrs . old, and that Miss W. C. MEEKS try 18/seven yrs old, and this there are no legal arguments to your Wedding. J. C. WELLS becoming sworn claims that the parents of Miss W. C. MEEKS provides considering their full say yes to the wedding of the child in order to Mr. T.

Sarah and you may Mark resided to the west of Haynesville during the Claiborne Parish to have a bit along with probably just one child, Willia Celestia MEEKS, the fresh https://lovingwomen.org/sv/koreanska-kvinnor/ partner from T. All loved ones ideas signify Willia Celestia MEEKS KERLEY was born November 30, 1865, from the Promise, Bienville Parish, Louisiana, in addition to grave marker ways a night out together out of delivery off 1865. I will suggest, however, that the go out out-of delivery could have indeed been November 30, 1863 in the place of you to go out within the 1865. Without a doubt, there is absolutely no delivery certificate. New passing certification is not any help, because suggests a night out together from beginning away from November 31, 1886, over five years after the date regarding their own matrimony. It does suggest a get older within loss of 52, and since the latest demise taken place January sixteen, 1919, she would were born in the 1866, making the 1886 probably a good typographical mistake. In support of different beginning big date, I’ve around three arguments:

  • The newest census taker in 1870, performing August 23, 1870, indicated that the child’s many years is actually 9. If you find yourself census takers is notoriously crappy within decades, it is extremely unusual, In my opinion, regarding younger an infant to have a delivery date you to far. It might simply be 36 months completely wrong on the fixed big date in the place of 5 years wrong into 1965 date. The new 1880 census taker detailed this given that 18, once more too old to have either date and incorrect just like the before their wedding, discussed lower than, when she wasn’t yet , 18.
  • Many major disagreement We have ‘s the wedding permit, copied verbatim for the shape ?. There are two transform towards the published form, the initial as being the requisite the lady be about to try to get years of age rather than parental consent, and also the 2nd becoming that out-old means try released to be used for the very first about three digits of your own big date being “187”, which is entered up on show a date away from Oct 21, 1881. To possess a November 29th birthday celebration and start to become seventeen, the season off beginning must be 1863. If she was really ten instead of on thirty day period timid of you are, would this new clerk have accepted the term of one’s groom’s brother that bride’s parents acknowledged the wedding?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *